From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Duncan Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] st: remove st_mutex Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 10:16:25 -0700 Message-ID: <50609569.4040304@suse.com> References: <504E6B7C.9010407@suse.com> <1348477560.2467.23.camel@dabdike> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:48895 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752398Ab2IXRQb (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:16:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1348477560.2467.23.camel@dabdike> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 09/24/2012 02:06 AM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 15:36 -0700, Lee Duncan wrote: >> From: Hannes Reinecke >> >> The st_mutex was created when the BKL was removed, and >> prevents simultaneous st_open calls. It is better to >> protect just the necessary data. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke >> Reviewed-by: Lee Duncan > > That should be Signed-off-by since you sent the patch to me. Signoffs > have to follow the chain of transmission. I've assumed this was just a > mistype. > > James Thank you James. -- Lee Duncan