From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751207Ab2IXWWX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:22:23 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:58859 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750778Ab2IXWWW (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:22:22 -0400 Message-ID: <5060DD0B.1020707@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 15:22:03 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Bolle CC: Joe Perches , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , x86@kernel.org, levinsasha928@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: x86: "Fast TSC calibration failed" error References: <1348488259.1436.22.camel@x61.thuisdomein> In-Reply-To: <1348488259.1436.22.camel@x61.thuisdomein> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/24/2012 05:04 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > 4) So, without even understanding why tsc calibration is needed, it does > look unnecessary to print "Fast TSC calibration failed" at error level. > If that's correct, I'd be happy to submit the trivial patch to downgrade > it to (say) informational level. > Please do. -hpa