From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RCU idle CPU detection is broken in linux-next
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5060E31B.3070203@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTL4hwqzS8iO2zOOGaizzMtT85MJExTxEgGbponJ4_gfv0nwA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Frederic,
On 09/24/2012 11:29 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Sasha,
>
> Can you please test the following branch:
>
> git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git rcu/idle-for-v3.7-take3
>
> with CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS and CONFIG_RCU_USER_QS_FORCE enabled.
>
> I hope this fixes the warning.
> The changes are:
>
> * add "x86: Unspaghettize do_general_protection()"
> * updated "x86: Exception hooks for userspace RCU extended QS" to
> handle some missed trap handlers. Especially do_general_protection()
> because I can see the problem triggered there in Sasha's warnings. I
> fixed more handlers in the way.
I've tested the branch above, and noticed two things:
- I had merge conflicts when pulling it on top of latest linux-next which I've resolved:
diff --cc arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index 1ba4850,cb20776..386b079
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@@ -644,8 -646,7 +647,9 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(math_state_restore)
dotraplinkage void __kprobes
do_device_not_available(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
{
+ BUG_ON(use_eager_fpu());
+
+ exception_enter(regs);
#ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
if (read_cr0() & X86_CR0_EM) {
struct math_emu_info info = { };
- While I no longer see the warnings I've originally noticed, if I run with Paul's last debug patch I see the following warning:
[ 212.200137] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/process.c:392 cpu_idle+0x12a/0x1f0()
[ 212.200141] Pid: 0, comm: swapper/3 Tainted: G W 3.6.0-rc6-next-20120924-sasha-00030-g71f256c #5
[ 212.200142] Call Trace:
[ 212.200146] [<ffffffff810799da>] ? cpu_idle+0x12a/0x1f0
[ 212.200150] [<ffffffff811078b6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x86/0xb0
[ 212.200153] [<ffffffff811079a5>] warn_slowpath_null+0x15/0x20
[ 212.200156] [<ffffffff810799da>] cpu_idle+0x12a/0x1f0
[ 212.200160] [<ffffffff839a3ee8>] ? setup_APIC_timer+0xb2/0xb6
Which is triggered by:
if (cpuidle_idle_call())
pm_idle();
rcu_idle_exit();
WARN_ON(rcu_is_cpu_idle()); <---- THIS
start_critical_timings();
/* In many cases the interrupt that ended idle
has already called exit_idle. But some idle
loops can be woken up without interrupt. */
WARN_ON(rcu_is_cpu_idle());
__exit_idle();
WARN_ON(rcu_is_cpu_idle());
Thanks,
Sasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-12 17:56 RCU idle CPU detection is broken in linux-next Sasha Levin
2012-09-19 15:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-19 16:35 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-19 17:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-19 22:27 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-20 7:33 ` Michael Wang
2012-09-20 7:44 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-20 8:14 ` Michael Wang
2012-09-20 15:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-21 9:30 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-21 12:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-21 13:26 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-21 15:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-21 15:18 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 8:26 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 15:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-22 15:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-22 15:40 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-22 17:50 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-22 21:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-23 0:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-23 5:39 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 21:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-24 22:47 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2012-09-24 22:54 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 23:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-24 23:10 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-24 23:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-24 23:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-25 4:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-25 11:59 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-25 13:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-26 14:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-26 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-25 12:06 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-25 18:28 ` Sasha Levin
2012-09-25 18:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-26 15:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2012-09-26 16:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-09-26 14:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5060E31B.3070203@gmail.com \
--to=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.