From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Message-ID: <5061BE52.50808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:23:14 -0400 From: Corey Bryant MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5060AB3F.5030400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120925040202.GA17983@openwall.com> In-Reply-To: <20120925040202.GA17983@openwall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Linux security workgroup usage of kernel-hardening mailing list To: Solar Designer Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com List-ID: On 09/25/2012 12:02 AM, Solar Designer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 02:49:35PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote: >> The charter of the workgroup is to provide on-going security >> verification of Linux kernel subsystems in order to assist in securing >> the Linux Kernel and maintain trust and confidence in the security of >> the Linux ecosystem. >> >> This may include, but is not limited to, topics such as tooling to >> assist in securing the Linux Kernel, verification and testing of >> critical subsystems for vulnerabilities, security improvements for build >> tools, and providing guidance for maintaining subsystem security. >> >> Would it be okay if we used the kernel-hardening mailing list for >> communication? > > Of course! Please do. > Excellent, thanks! Should we tag our subjects with anything? I was thinking "lswg: ". >> If our traffic ever gets to be too much > > This would be a good problem to have (well, assuming that list traffic > correlates with actual progress). :) > > Alexander > > > -- Regards, Corey Bryant