From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
rusty@rustcorp.com.au, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
pjones@redhat.com, jwboyer@redhat.com,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:43:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5061D12F.1000308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30071.1348587320@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Il 25/09/2012 17:35, David Howells ha scritto:
> Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> > Generate a certificate that is valid from a few minutes before the
>> > wallclock time. It's a certificate policy question not a kernel hackery
>> > one.
> That doesn't seem to be possible with openssl req. What would you recommend?
Disgusting, but: add an LD_PRELOAD library that returns a time well in
the past.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-25 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 0:07 [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing David Howells
2012-09-25 0:11 ` David Howells
2012-09-25 15:09 ` Wrong system clock vs X.509 date specifiers David Howells
2012-09-25 15:30 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-25 15:35 ` David Howells
2012-09-25 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-09-25 16:00 ` Alan Cox
2012-09-25 21:57 ` David Howells
2012-09-25 16:02 ` Tomas Mraz
2012-09-25 17:31 ` David Howells
2012-09-25 18:39 ` Tomas Mraz
2013-03-14 10:48 ` David Woodhouse
2013-03-14 12:24 ` [PATCH] Fix x509_key_preparse() not to reject keys outside their validity time range David Woodhouse
2013-03-19 21:06 ` Alexander Holler
2012-09-25 15:44 ` [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-09-25 16:15 ` David Howells
2012-09-26 3:46 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-26 9:09 ` David Howells
2012-09-27 0:12 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-27 9:08 ` David Howells
2012-09-28 5:55 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 8:13 ` David Howells
2012-09-28 5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] modsign: don't use bashism in sh scripts Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 8:10 ` David Howells
2012-10-02 2:24 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 5:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] modules: don't call eu-strip if it doesn't exist Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 8:11 ` David Howells
2012-09-28 6:05 ` [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 8:09 ` David Howells
2012-09-29 6:53 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-29 7:13 ` David Howells
2012-10-01 20:41 ` Josh Boyer
2012-10-02 3:28 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-02 12:17 ` Josh Boyer
2012-09-29 7:16 ` David Howells
2012-10-02 6:12 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-02 14:07 ` David Howells
2012-10-03 23:22 ` Rusty Russell
2012-10-09 10:55 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2012-10-10 9:37 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 9:23 ` David Howells
2012-09-28 10:31 ` David Howells
2012-10-03 17:50 ` [patch] MODSIGN: Fix build error with strict typechecking David Rientjes
2012-09-27 2:04 ` [GIT PULL] Asymmetric keys and module signing Mimi Zohar
2012-09-28 6:54 ` Rusty Russell
2012-09-28 6:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-09-28 8:00 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5061D12F.1000308@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.