From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57409)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1TGt2H-0008FR-IV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:56:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1TGt2B-0003SZ-TN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:56:25 -0400
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:34366)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1TGt2B-0003IT-La
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:56:19 -0400
Message-ID: <50631789.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:56:09 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1348584532-21914-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<876271ol4w.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5062AA0C.60303@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<CAFEAcA8F2otWMrJC99xRv3mHtovO9gBxjk-ysqjVASe6QShtxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5062BA23.705@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<CAFEAcA9sjxHc9JddAFW99=0MA0H8_eWXRr8=ttdUVp3SfTPGsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ehloj3rr.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <87ehloj3rr.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] stop using stdio for monitor/serial/etc
 with -daemonize
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>

On 26.09.2012 17:46, Anthony Liguori wrote:
[]
> This is a good example of where we need improved documentation but I
> agree 100% with Peter.

So what do we do?

We've a clear bug, I can only fix it in the patch to the Debian
package, since I've been asked about this bug multiple times,
and I care about our users. It is at least consistent with the
expectations.  Maybe at the same time, it's a good idea to print
a warning about -nographic being deprecated, but this part should
definitely be done upstream first.

Thanks,

/mjt