From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43102) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH9Vh-00053l-6o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:31:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH9Vg-0000tY-7X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:31:53 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:48412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TH9Vf-0000tU-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 04:31:52 -0400 Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so3248716pbb.4 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <50640EEE.2070709@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:31:42 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120924091008.GJ18470@in.ibm.com> <20120924091340.GN18470@in.ibm.com> <5062D24F.7030304@redhat.com> <20120926161132.GA32195@in.ibm.com> <50632F6A.5020202@redhat.com> <20120927064132.GB18285@in.ibm.com> <5063FE06.3070304@redhat.com> <20120927082846.GC18285@in.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20120927082846.GC18285@in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 4/4] block: Support GlusterFS as a QEMU block backend. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Kevin Wolf , Anthony Liguori , Anand Avati , Vijay Bellur , Stefan Hajnoczi , Harsh Bora , Amar Tumballi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Richard W.M. Jones" , Blue Swirl , Avi Kivity , Daniel Veillard Il 27/09/2012 10:28, Bharata B Rao ha scritto: >> > >> > How would the URIs look like? > gluster://server/testvol//dir/a.img ? > Isn't this a valid URI ? Here volname=testvol and image=/dir/a.img. It is, but I think it would be canonicalized to gluster://server/testvol/dir/a.img. > If that's valid and needs to be supported, then the above strspn based > parsing logic needs some rewrite. I think we can avoid this, it is unintuitive. Paolo