From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:01:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] USB: ohci-at91: fix null pointer in ohci_hcd_at91_overcurrent_irq In-Reply-To: <20120925134050.GC15419@kroah.com> References: <1348433760-2818-1-git-send-email-joachim.eastwood@jotron.com> <50600F5F.7030307@atmel.com> <20120924173407.GE32691@kroah.com> <50617DFB.3070405@atmel.com> <20120925134050.GC15419@kroah.com> Message-ID: <506415CD.5070004@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/25/2012 03:40 PM, Greg KH : > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:48:43AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 09/24/2012 07:34 PM, Greg KH : >>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 09:44:31AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>>> This patches fixed the issue by adding the gpio valid check. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre >>>> >>>> Thanks a *lot* Joachim for having chased this bug! >>>> >>>> Alan, Greg, this one is 3.6 last minute material... I Hope that it can >>>> make it! >>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Note: If 6fffb77c goes into stable please either include this patch also or >>>>> fold it into 6fffb77c to avoid regressions. >>>> >>>> Absolutely, I have tagged the faulty patch: >>>> Cc: Stable [3.4+] >>>> >>>> So it can be good if this one can follow the same path. >>> >>> I'll queue this up for 3.7 and have it backported to 3.6.1 as it's a bit >>> late for 3.6 for me right now. >> >> Ah, too bad! The kernel Oops may affect several AT91 SoC... Can't we >> push it with the help of Andrew Morton for late material? > > 3.6.1 is really too late for you? What does one week buy you? Well, even if I appreciate a lot the stable tree ;-) , I find it a little bit annoying to know in advance that next Linus' release will contain a fatal bug for AT91 SoCs. Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre