All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: MMU: fix release noslot pfn
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:25:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50647E0B.6080303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506052D1.5000006@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 09/24/2012 02:32 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:

> 3 places after the whole patchset (There are some cleanups after this patch).
> 
>> and one by even stronger is_error_pfn(). 
> 
> This one is:
> 
> |	if (!is_error_pfn(pfn)) {
> |                kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> |                return true;
> |	}
> |
> |	return false;
> 
> We can change it to:
> 
> | if (is_error_pfn(pfn))
> |	return false;
> |
> | kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> | return true;
> 
>> I guess when/if other architectures will add MMIO MMU
>> caching they will need to guard kvm_release_pfn_clean() by is_noslot_pfn()
>> too in most cases. I am not insisting, but as this patch shows it is
>> easy to miss the check before calling the function.
> 
> Sounds reasonable. I will consider it if Avi/Marcelo have no object on
> it.

I think it's a good idea.

Looks like we traded the unscalable error pages for these branches, I
think it's a reasonable tradeoff.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-27 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-21  6:56 [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: MMU: fix release pfn in mmu code Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-21  6:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: MMU: fix release noslot pfn Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-23  9:13   ` Gleb Natapov
2012-09-24  4:59     ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-24 11:24       ` Gleb Natapov
2012-09-24 11:49         ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-24 12:04           ` Gleb Natapov
2012-09-24 12:32             ` Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-27 16:25               ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-09-21  6:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] KVM: MMU: remove mmu_is_invalid Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-21  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] KVM: MMU: do not release pfn in mmu_set_spte Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-21  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(page_fault) Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-21  6:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: MMU: introduce FNAME(prefetch_gpte) Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-21  6:59 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: MMU: move prefetch_invalid_gpte out of pagaing_tmp.h Xiao Guangrong
2012-09-21  7:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] KVM: MMU: introduce page_fault_start/page_fault_end Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50647E0B.6080303@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.