From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757332Ab2I1Ijr (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:39:47 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:56502 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757308Ab2I1Ijo (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:39:44 -0400 Message-ID: <5065622F.3040001@kernel.dk> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 10:39:11 +0200 From: Jens Axboe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shaohua Li CC: NeilBrown , Shaohua Li , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: makes bio_split support bio without data References: <20120924145639.3b65fd8b@notabene.brown> <5061A8EA.6040702@kernel.dk> <20120928073655.GA24681@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20120928073655.GA24681@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2012-09-28 09:36, Shaohua Li wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:51:54PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 09/24/2012 06:56 AM, NeilBrown wrote: >>> >>> Hi Jens, >>> this patch has been sitting in my -next tree for a little while and I was >>> hoping for it to go in for the next merge window. >>> It simply allows bio_split() to be used on bios without a payload, such as >>> 'discard'. >>> Are you happy with it going in though my 'md' tree, or would you rather take >>> it though your 'block' tree? >> >> It should go through my tree, especially since we've got conflicts with >> other changes. In other words, your patch does not apply to for-3.7/core >> as-is... >> >> Shaohua, could you resend an updated variant? > Here is the one applied to for-3.7/core Thanks Shaohua, applied! -- Jens Axboe