From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stigge@antcom.de (Roland Stigge) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:32:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib In-Reply-To: <20120928102822.GY17667@game.jcrosoft.org> References: <1348780923-27428-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120928024744.GV17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <50654E57.3080201@antcom.de> <20120928075145.GW17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <50656522.1050900@antcom.de> <20120928090848.GX17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <20120928102822.GY17667@game.jcrosoft.org> Message-ID: <50658AD0.1050501@antcom.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/28/2012 12:28 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> gpio0 = {1}; >> set0 = {1}; >> >> gpio1 = {33, 34}; > here should be > > pin0 = {1}; > set0 = {1}; > > pin1 = {1, 2, 23}; > set1 = {0, 0, 1}; > > set_blocks(gpio_chip0, pin0, set0, 1); > set_blocks(gpio_chip1, pin1, set1, 3); > > You may need to add a prepare to do not do the conversion between array and > gpio_chip array as I guess you will work on gpio block with multiple time > acces Maybe like this, for some struct block *? block = set_block_prepare(gc, pins, values, size); if (block) { set_block(gc, block); ... set_block_unprepare(gc, block); } Would mean that all supported drivers would need to implement those 3 new functions... Need to be careful about not introducing bloat... Thanks, Roland From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757332Ab2I1Lcf (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:32:35 -0400 Received: from antcom.de ([188.40.178.216]:44440 "EHLO chuck.antcom.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756923Ab2I1Lce (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:32:34 -0400 Message-ID: <50658AD0.1050501@antcom.de> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:32:32 +0200 From: Roland Stigge Organization: ANTCOM IT Research & Development User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD CC: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, w.sang@pengutronix.de, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib References: <1348780923-27428-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <20120928024744.GV17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <50654E57.3080201@antcom.de> <20120928075145.GW17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <50656522.1050900@antcom.de> <20120928090848.GX17667@game.jcrosoft.org> <20120928102822.GY17667@game.jcrosoft.org> In-Reply-To: <20120928102822.GY17667@game.jcrosoft.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 OpenPGP: url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/28/2012 12:28 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> gpio0 = {1}; >> set0 = {1}; >> >> gpio1 = {33, 34}; > here should be > > pin0 = {1}; > set0 = {1}; > > pin1 = {1, 2, 23}; > set1 = {0, 0, 1}; > > set_blocks(gpio_chip0, pin0, set0, 1); > set_blocks(gpio_chip1, pin1, set1, 3); > > You may need to add a prepare to do not do the conversion between array and > gpio_chip array as I guess you will work on gpio block with multiple time > acces Maybe like this, for some struct block *? block = set_block_prepare(gc, pins, values, size); if (block) { set_block(gc, block); ... set_block_unprepare(gc, block); } Would mean that all supported drivers would need to implement those 3 new functions... Need to be careful about not introducing bloat... Thanks, Roland