From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for timers Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:30:16 -0500 Message-ID: <506616E8.9000006@ti.com> References: <1347579091-3794-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <505A7E0B.30709@ti.com> <20120920235309.GO28835@atomide.com> <5063330E.3000203@ti.com> <5065F19E.5020708@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:43935 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032656Ab2I1Va3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:30:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5065F19E.5020708@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Vaibhav Hiremath Cc: Tony Lindgren , device-tree , Rob Herring , linux-omap , linux-arm On 09/28/2012 01:51 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > > On 9/26/2012 10:23 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 09/20/2012 06:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Benoit Cousson [120919 19:24]: >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> I was about to take the DTS patch, but was wondering if you will pull >>>> the driver changes for 3.7. >>> >>> I suggest that you do a separate branch on top of Paul's hwmod series >>> when he posts those if that works for you? >> >> Benoit, I see that you have pulled in the DTS patch. >> >> Do you guys want me to rebase the remaining patches with Rob's change on >> Tony's master branch and re-submit? >> > > Jon, > > Sorry for delayed response, But I tried using your omap_test application > to validate this patch series, but it is failing for me. > > How did you test it? Are you running same test application at your end? Check your email on Sept 14th. I sent you the latest version of the test code. I will resend in case it got lost in deep space. > I am debugging this issue, i just thought I should tell you this before > its too late. > > > Below is the log - > > [root@arago /]# echo 3 > /tmp/omap-test/timer/one > [ 79.612223] omap_dm_timer_request_specific: Please use > omap_dm_timer_request_by_cap() > [ 79.620636] Timer 3 not available! Yes that's expected as omap_dm_timer_request_specific is not supported with DT. Don't spend anytime debugging you just need the latest test. Cheers Jon From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jon-hunter@ti.com (Jon Hunter) Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:30:16 -0500 Subject: [PATCH V2 0/7] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for timers In-Reply-To: <5065F19E.5020708@ti.com> References: <1347579091-3794-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <505A7E0B.30709@ti.com> <20120920235309.GO28835@atomide.com> <5063330E.3000203@ti.com> <5065F19E.5020708@ti.com> Message-ID: <506616E8.9000006@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 09/28/2012 01:51 PM, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote: > > > On 9/26/2012 10:23 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 09/20/2012 06:53 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Benoit Cousson [120919 19:24]: >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> I was about to take the DTS patch, but was wondering if you will pull >>>> the driver changes for 3.7. >>> >>> I suggest that you do a separate branch on top of Paul's hwmod series >>> when he posts those if that works for you? >> >> Benoit, I see that you have pulled in the DTS patch. >> >> Do you guys want me to rebase the remaining patches with Rob's change on >> Tony's master branch and re-submit? >> > > Jon, > > Sorry for delayed response, But I tried using your omap_test application > to validate this patch series, but it is failing for me. > > How did you test it? Are you running same test application at your end? Check your email on Sept 14th. I sent you the latest version of the test code. I will resend in case it got lost in deep space. > I am debugging this issue, i just thought I should tell you this before > its too late. > > > Below is the log - > > [root at arago /]# echo 3 > /tmp/omap-test/timer/one > [ 79.612223] omap_dm_timer_request_specific: Please use > omap_dm_timer_request_by_cap() > [ 79.620636] Timer 3 not available! Yes that's expected as omap_dm_timer_request_specific is not supported with DT. Don't spend anytime debugging you just need the latest test. Cheers Jon