From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
"zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com" <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: mtrr: Constrain WB MTRR to max phys mem prior to cleanup
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:17:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50675776.10702@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120929201107.GB8329@khazad-dum.debian.net>
>
> Intel doesn't make it easy to get all processor specification updates at
> once so that I could hunt down every processor which acknowledges the
> existence of that errata before replying, so I will assume for the moment
> that the comment is mostly correct.
>
I should say: as far as I know the blacklist is there because noone has
been willing to bother looking at if it actually matters, given how old
the hardware is.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-29 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-07 17:44 [RFC] x86: mtrr: Constrain WB MTRR to max phys mem prior to cleanup Peter Hurley
2012-09-07 18:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-10 3:54 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-09-28 17:37 ` Peter Hurley
2012-09-29 2:41 ` Zhenzhong Duan
2012-09-29 3:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-29 10:46 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-09-29 15:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-29 20:11 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-09-29 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-09-29 20:17 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-09-29 21:25 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-24 20:51 Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50675776.10702@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.