From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
Cc: openembedded-core <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opkg: Don't call sync() when installing into an offline root
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 08:15:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506B04FE.1000502@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1348921205.4422.47.camel@x121e.pbcl.net>
On 09/29/2012 05:20 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
> Even when installing onto a live target system, calling sync() during
> package installation is of somewhat questionable benefit. But calling
> it on the build host during rootfs construction is certainly useless and
> can cause I/O to stall for several seconds on even a moderately sized
> host which is clearly not desirable.
>
> (From a patch originally by Mike Crowe.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> ---
> .../opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..b1b3453
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg/opkg-no-sync-offline.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +When installing into an offline root, calling sync() is pointless and just
> +hurts performance. Don't let's do that.
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +
> +--- a/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c 2011-09-08 10:53:07.000000000 +0100
> ++++ b/libopkg/opkg_cmd.c 2011-10-04 10:45:22.278615584 +0100
> +@@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ write_status_files_if_changed(void)
> + opkg_msg(INFO, "Writing status file.\n");
> + opkg_conf_write_status_files();
> + pkg_write_changed_filelists();
> +- sync();
> ++ if (!conf->offline_root)
> ++ sync();
> + } else {
> + opkg_msg(DEBUG, "Nothing to be done.\n");
> + }
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb
> index 820a224..f206cd5 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg_svn.bb
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ SRC_URI = "svn://opkg.googlecode.com/svn;module=trunk;protocol=http \
> file://0006-detect-circular-dependencies.patch \
> file://0007-merge-newpkg-provides-even-when-oldpkg-provides-exis.patch \
> file://0008-select_higher_version.patch \
> + file://opkg-no-sync-offline.patch \
> "
>
> S = "${WORKDIR}/trunk"
> @@ -16,4 +17,4 @@ S = "${WORKDIR}/trunk"
> SRCREV = "633"
> PV = "0.1.8+svnr${SRCPV}"
>
> -PR = "${INC_PR}.4"
> +PR = "${INC_PR}.5"
>
Merged into OE-Core (with additional PR bump)
Thanks
Sau!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-02 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-29 12:20 [PATCH] opkg: Don't call sync() when installing into an offline root Phil Blundell
2012-10-02 15:15 ` Saul Wold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506B04FE.1000502@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=philb@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.