From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: align the SmartReflex fck names Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:08:00 -0700 Message-ID: <506B65C0.7070902@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1348134503-28220-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <1348497352-6464-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <87626s8rys.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <87626s8rys.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jean Pihet Cc: paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On 10/02/2012 02:49 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jean Pihet writes: > >> Rename the smartreflex fck names for consistency and better readability; >> rename the clock aliases for use by the SmartReflex driver, with the >> "smartreflex.%d" format. > > hmm, do we even need the clkdev nodes anymore? The driver isn't > directly accessing the fclk at all, so it seems like these could be > removed now. Please ignore this comment, I see what you're doing in the other series now. See my comments there. Kevin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khilman@deeprootsystems.com (Kevin Hilman) Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:08:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: align the SmartReflex fck names In-Reply-To: <87626s8rys.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> References: <1348134503-28220-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <1348497352-6464-1-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com> <87626s8rys.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> Message-ID: <506B65C0.7070902@deeprootsystems.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/02/2012 02:49 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Jean Pihet writes: > >> Rename the smartreflex fck names for consistency and better readability; >> rename the clock aliases for use by the SmartReflex driver, with the >> "smartreflex.%d" format. > > hmm, do we even need the clkdev nodes anymore? The driver isn't > directly accessing the fclk at all, so it seems like these could be > removed now. Please ignore this comment, I see what you're doing in the other series now. See my comments there. Kevin