From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Witold Szczeponik Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface) Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:57:25 +0200 Message-ID: <506C6065.3070202@gmx.net> References: <50158321.4030007@gmx.net> <201208022340.16948.rjw@sisk.pl> <5055DFB6.6070809@gmx.net> <201209182342.30244.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:40948 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932532Ab2JCP5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:57:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <201209182342.30244.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , bhelgaas@google.com, lenb@kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 18/09/12 23:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI? >> The first patch simplifies the code, while the third patch fixes a problem in >> the PNP resource allocation. Any chances to have them included in 3.7? > > They would be fine as far as I'm concerned, but I'm not maintaining that part > of the kernel (at least at the moment). > > I'm not sure who's the maintainer of it, to be honest. According to the maintainer list, this would be Len and Bjorn. Hence... Len and Bjorn, any chances to include the patches in 3.7? I checked them against 3.6 and they applied without any change. Or should I resend them individually? Thanks. --- Witold > > Thanks, > Rafael >