From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/18] pc: create "PC" device class
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:00:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506DB297.8060509@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506D940D.7080600@redhat.com>
Am 04.10.2012 15:50, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 04/10/2012 15:46, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>>> +typedef struct PC {
>>>> + DeviceState parent_obj;
>>>> +} PC;
>> So the general problem with this approach is that it strays from
>> modeling hardware.
>
> It doesn't really; it's a motherboard object, there's no reason why
> /machine shouldn't be a Device itself, with a few objects (CPUs, the
> i440FX, the IOAPIC, and of course the peripherals) hanging off it.
On the other hand, why should it? We'd have QEMUMachine::reset vs.
DeviceState::reset then and I don't see an immanent need for gpio / irqs
on the mainboard either (on evaluation boards there are, but they are
usually properties of the SoC modelling-wise).
If we want to bundle objects, we have a dedicated Container type;
otherwise we could just derive from TYPE_OBJECT directly.
In the end it just goes back to our attempt to generalize the properties
mechanisms and/or to a lack of APIs to do exactly what we want... ;)
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-04 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-03 13:28 [Qemu-devel] [RFC v2 00/18] Fix APIC-ID-based CPU topology Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 01/18] pc: create "PC" device class Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 14:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-03 14:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 14:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-04 13:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-04 13:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-04 14:28 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-04 14:43 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 15:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-04 16:03 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 17:42 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-04 17:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 16:00 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2012-10-04 13:57 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 14:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-04 15:57 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 17:43 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-10-03 13:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 02/18] pc: create PC object on pc_init1() Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 14:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-03 14:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 14:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-03 13:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 03/18] pc: add PC object argument to some init functions Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 11:56 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 04/18] move I/O-related definitions from qemu-common.h to a new header (qemu-stdio.h) Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 05/18] cpus.h: include qemu-stdio.h Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 12:00 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-10-04 13:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 14:05 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 06/18] hw/apic.c: rename bit functions to not conflict with bitops.h (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 07/18] kvm: create kvm_arch_vcpu_id() function Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 08/18] target-i386: kvm: set vcpu_id to APIC ID instead of CPU index (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 09/18] target-i386: cpu: move cpuid_apic_id initialization to cpu_x86_register() Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 10/18] target-i386: cpu: add apic_id argument " Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 11/18] target-i386: cpu_x86_init: allow APIC ID to be set by caller Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-04 12:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 12/18] fw_cfg: remove FW_CFG_MAX_CPUS from fw_cfg_init() Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 13/18] pc: set explicit APIC ID for CPUs Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 14/18] pc: create apic_id_for_cpu() function (v3) Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 15/18] pc: set fw_cfg data based on APIC ID calculation (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 16/18] tests: support target-specific unit tests Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 17/18] target-i386: topology & APIC ID utility functions (v2) Eduardo Habkost
2012-10-03 20:11 ` Blue Swirl
2012-10-03 13:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC 18/18] pc: generate APIC IDs according to CPU topology (v3) Eduardo Habkost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506DB297.8060509@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.