All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Questions on direct-cabling 3x3 MIMO systems (ath9k)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:49:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506DDA1D.1090106@candelatech.com> (raw)

I finally got my 3-attenuator system up and running,
and I'm starting to do some tests.

AP and Station are running 3.5.5+, ath9k ar9380 NICs.
Channel 157, HT40, no encryption.

One question right away:  Should I expect decent performance
if I directly cable 2 wifi NICs, where one is acting as AP and
the other as station?  I'm cabling ch0 to ch0, ch1 to ch1, ch2 to ch2.

If I add about 15dBm of attenuation in this setup, max download
speed is about 70Mbps, though the station may train up to 450Mbps
rate.  Signal is reported as -23, and noise at -93.

Throughput stays about the same all the way to signal of -68 or so, though
the trained rate drops to around 270Mbps.

I can't make the signal quality go lower (even by attaching terminators
directly to the antenna mounts on the AP).  Guess I'll need some sort of
box to double-box these systems and hopefully drown out more of the RF.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


             reply	other threads:[~2012-10-04 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-04 18:49 Ben Greear [this message]
2012-10-04 22:06 ` Questions on direct-cabling 3x3 MIMO systems (ath9k) Ben Greear
2012-10-04 22:36 ` Julian Calaby
2012-10-04 22:41   ` Ben Greear
2012-10-04 22:53     ` Julian Calaby
2012-10-04 23:01       ` Ben Greear
2012-10-04 23:48         ` Julian Calaby
2012-10-05 17:44           ` Ben Greear

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506DDA1D.1090106@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.