All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <506DDA31.9010503@codeaurora.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 90685b6..981c410 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@ On 10/04/12 09:55, Olof Johansson wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
->> Is the arm at kernel.org alias going to be added into the MAINTAINERS file?
+>> Is the arm@kernel.org alias going to be added into the MAINTAINERS file?
 >> Should anybody be sending mails to this address?
 >>
 >> It seems I asked this over a year ago and the response was positive but
 >> nothing ever happened[1]. Maybe something like below? I only ask because
 >> get_maintainer.pl isn't picking up this email.
 > I've been holding off re-proposing this, mostly because life is easier
-> for us if we don't get arm at kernel.org cc:d on every single patch by
+> for us if we don't get arm@kernel.org cc:d on every single patch by
 > people who run get_maintainers.pl -- it's the equivalent of getting
 > linux-arm-kernel cc:d to your inbox. It's better signal-to-noise ratio
 > if it's mostly platform maintainers that email us on that address with
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index e38364c..d300821 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,23 +1,26 @@
  "ref\0506D4BCD.3020402@codeaurora.org\0"
  "ref\0CAOesGMjotnx_6HiwngRO9OaZYGGAexiwZ_shkOK7qROZcjDmqA@mail.gmail.com\0"
- "From\0sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)\0"
- "Subject\0arm-soc maintainer entry\0"
+ "From\0Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: arm-soc maintainer entry\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 04 Oct 2012 11:49:21 -0700\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>\0"
+ "Cc\0arm@kernel.org"
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
+ " Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On 10/04/12 09:55, Olof Johansson wrote:\n"
  "> Hi,\n"
  ">\n"
  "> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:\n"
- ">> Is the arm at kernel.org alias going to be added into the MAINTAINERS file?\n"
+ ">> Is the arm@kernel.org alias going to be added into the MAINTAINERS file?\n"
  ">> Should anybody be sending mails to this address?\n"
  ">>\n"
  ">> It seems I asked this over a year ago and the response was positive but\n"
  ">> nothing ever happened[1]. Maybe something like below? I only ask because\n"
  ">> get_maintainer.pl isn't picking up this email.\n"
  "> I've been holding off re-proposing this, mostly because life is easier\n"
- "> for us if we don't get arm at kernel.org cc:d on every single patch by\n"
+ "> for us if we don't get arm@kernel.org cc:d on every single patch by\n"
  "> people who run get_maintainers.pl -- it's the equivalent of getting\n"
  "> linux-arm-kernel cc:d to your inbox. It's better signal-to-noise ratio\n"
  "> if it's mostly platform maintainers that email us on that address with\n"
@@ -34,4 +37,4 @@
  "Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,\n"
  hosted by The Linux Foundation
 
-ff538f8c33f54a6fd98e80309a72eaf4405e73a44eee73e80ee0c474eeb102fd
+cfa689479024a38070a72d351cd0184b51549fc5ddf30ea9c03216dd156233f3

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.