All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Wright <rwright@hp.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tmac@hp.com, hpa@zytor.com, rwright@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix devmem_is_allowed for below 1MB accesses for an  efi machine
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 14:07:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <506DEC95.8050806@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jQpxf-3Cv-1@gated-at.bofh.it>

On 10/02/2012 11:20 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> Oh, right, got you. In that case I think we potentially need a 
> finer-grained check on EFI platforms - the EFI memory map is kind enough 
> to tell us the difference between unusable regions and io regions, and 
> we could avoid access to the unusable ones.


I wanted to mention in this context a patch RFC I posted yesterday as a
distinct thread which is visible as https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/3/589
with the subject: [PATCH RFC] function probe_roms accessing improper
addresses on UEFI systems.

While the mechanism is different from Tmac's patch (because probe_roms
runs early in boot, prior to resource structure initialization) the
intent of the change is the same: to prevent a machine check resulting
from access to inappropriate physical addresses.

I will monitor both this thread as well as my own recent RFC posting
since the underlying issues are common.

-- 
Randy Wright        <rwright@hp.com>        +1-970-898-0998

       reply	other threads:[~2012-10-04 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <jQim6-6MC-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <jQiFt-6UB-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <jQoUx-33k-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <jQp4d-37r-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <jQpxf-3Cv-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2012-10-04 20:07         ` Randy Wright [this message]
2012-10-04 21:06           ` [PATCH] Fix devmem_is_allowed for below 1MB accesses for an efi machine H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-02 21:32 T Makphaibulchoke
2012-10-02 21:32 ` T Makphaibulchoke
2012-10-02 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-02 21:50   ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03  4:31   ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03  4:31     ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03  4:44     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03  4:44       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03  5:15       ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03  5:15         ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03  5:13         ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2012-10-03  5:13           ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2012-10-03  5:28           ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03  5:28             ` Matthew Garrett
2012-10-03  5:35             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03  5:35               ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03  5:27         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-10-03  5:27           ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=506DEC95.8050806@hp.com \
    --to=rwright@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tmac@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.