From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [143.182.124.37]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6081CE01199 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 05:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2012 05:52:19 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,541,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="200948222" Received: from linux.jf.intel.com (HELO linux.intel.com) ([10.23.219.25]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2012 05:52:19 -0700 Received: from [10.237.105.49] (mlindnex-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com [10.237.105.49]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBAF2C8001; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 05:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <506ED801.9030003@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:52:17 +0300 From: Mihai Lindner Organization: Intel OTC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Purdie References: <57468146a5fbeb836ac941d51fc6f41031e41b03.1349435514.git.mihaix.lindner@linux.intel.com> <1349437880.15658.22.camel@ted> In-Reply-To: <1349437880.15658.22.camel@ted> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] meta-tlk: fix ignored SRC_URI appends X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 12:52:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2012-10-05 14:51, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 14:20 +0300, Mihai Lindner wrote: >> Fix SRC_URI appends ignored by meta-cedartrail and meta-crownbay. Used >> SRC_URI_append instead of SRC_URI. >> Also placed all variables in an .inc file to be required by all >> linux-yocto recipes in here, since all versions use the same. >> >> [YOCTO #3217] >> >> Signed-off-by: Mihai Lindner >> --- >> meta-tlk/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto.inc | 3 +++ > > Could you use a slightly less generic name for this include please? I > worry about collisions... > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > > Sure. Thanks, -- Mihai Lindner