From: "Swâmi Petaramesh" <swami@petaramesh.org>
To: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BTRFS, getting darn slower everyday
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 08:22:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50727125.4010501@petaramesh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201210071644.19815.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Le 07/10/2012 16:44, Martin Steigerwald a écrit :
> I think you need to backup, reformat and restore from backup for now.
No way. 4 machines on each of which 2 to 4 different OSes are sharing
the same BTRFS volume !
If I ever need to reformat/reinstall all this, the new format won't be
BTRFS ! I would be pissed off to a point where I would stick to either
ext4 or ZFS, all of which work nicely (I have a complex system that has
been running very fine on ZFS for 1.5 year)...
> How did you measure this? Is this just the boot times you mentioned in
> the original article?
No highly scientific measurement. I don't live with benchmarks, but with
the impression that my machine is nicely swift or painfully slow.
When it comes to 4 minutes for boot, 40 seconds for opening a brower, 1+
minute for Thunderbird... 15 minutes for installing an innocent set of
updates... I'm under the impression that it's painfully slow.
Kind regards.
--
Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E
Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-07 9:26 BTRFS, getting darn slower everyday Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-07 10:59 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-07 14:05 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-07 14:48 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-08 6:16 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-12-09 5:17 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-12-09 10:13 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-09 10:41 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-12-09 11:20 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-12-09 11:38 ` Hugo Mills
2012-12-09 22:51 ` Bob Marley
2012-12-09 14:38 ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-10-07 11:02 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-07 12:33 ` Alex
2012-10-07 13:19 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-07 14:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-07 22:47 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-08 6:08 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-08 11:38 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-08 13:36 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-08 15:50 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-08 16:46 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-10-08 6:22 ` Swâmi Petaramesh [this message]
2012-11-14 16:17 ` Peter Maloney
2012-10-07 13:00 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-07 13:14 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-07 14:41 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-10-08 16:09 ` Josef Bacik
2012-10-08 16:15 ` Swâmi Petaramesh
2012-10-08 16:31 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50727125.4010501@petaramesh.org \
--to=swami@petaramesh.org \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.