All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] versatile: Push lsi initialization to the end
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:18:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5072EEB7.2070408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5072782E.9090707@siemens.com>

Il 08/10/2012 08:52, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
> On 2012-10-06 04:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 October 2012 19:01, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>> I'm not a fan of this either, but the alternatives are way more
>>> complicated. We either need to rewrite the chardev subsystem,
>>> specifically how mux'ed devices are registered and how the active one is
>>> selected. Or we need to avoid flushing "unrelated" BHs for block
>>> devices. Not sure of those read requests can be postponed.
>>
>> Is this a regression? If it is then the obvious answer is to back
>> out whatever broke it...
> 
> I'm using this machine for the first time, so I cannot answer this from
> the top of my head. However, I don't think it can be a regression.
> 
> Mux chardevs work like this: You create the backend, then you register
> the frontend with them, one by one. The last one registered is the first
> one active. It should also receive the open event of chardev. But as
> that open even is issued via a BH and last frontend, the serial device,
> arrives after the first BH flushing, things break.

Does something like this work instead?

diff --git a/qemu-char.c b/qemu-char.c
index b082bae..1ed6d49 100644
--- a/qemu-char.c
+++ b/qemu-char.c
@@ -465,6 +465,9 @@ static void
mux_chr_update_read_handler(CharDriverState *chr)
     d->focus = d->mux_cnt;
     d->mux_cnt++;
     mux_chr_send_event(d, d->focus, CHR_EVENT_MUX_IN);
+    if (chr->opened) {
+        mux_chr_send_event(d, d->focus, CHR_EVENT_OPENED);
+    }
 }

 static CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_mux(CharDriverState *drv)

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-08 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-05 17:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] versatile: Push lsi initialization to the end Jan Kiszka
2012-10-05 17:42 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-05 18:01   ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-06  2:13     ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-08  6:52       ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 15:18         ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-10-08 15:28           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 16:02             ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-08 16:28               ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-10-08 16:46                 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 17:07         ` Aurelien Jarno
2012-10-08 17:09           ` Jan Kiszka
2012-10-08 16:33 ` Peter Maydell
2012-10-08 16:39   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5072EEB7.2070408@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.