From: "\"Jan H. Schönherr\"" <schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:54:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50732F8A.9090109@cs.tu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPXgP13GCsooDtbor9_OvyDCZjPARL_On_cBtEoxTUWnVsBpvw@mail.gmail.com>
Am 08.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Kay Sievers:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:49 PM, "Jan H. Schönherr"
>
>>> Given that I'm able to fix the racing case, would you be in favor of
>>> this approach, or should we stick to the earlier version?
>>
>> I'm open to everything that makes sense. Let's see how it looks and we
>> can decide when we have something that passes the tests.
>
> Jan,
> any updates, did you try something else?
> Or should we merge the first version for now?
I'm working on it, though I cannot spend as much time as I want. :)
My current version does mostly well for race-printk()s, now. But
there's still one issue to resolve and some polishing to do.
If we can afford to wait a little longer, we might get a nicer
solution (and avoid a possible mostly-revert later).
Regards
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-08 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-26 17:58 [PATCH] printk: drop ambiguous LOG_CONT flag Jan H. Schönherr
2012-09-26 21:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-09-26 22:33 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-27 13:39 ` Kay Sievers
2012-09-27 15:46 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-27 16:04 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-28 8:25 ` Jan H. Schönherr
2012-09-28 14:34 ` Kay Sievers
2012-09-28 14:49 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-09-28 14:56 ` Kay Sievers
2012-10-08 19:24 ` Kay Sievers
2012-10-08 19:54 ` "Jan H. Schönherr" [this message]
2012-10-08 19:56 ` Kay Sievers
2012-11-02 3:53 ` Kay Sievers
2012-11-02 22:37 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-11-02 23:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-11-03 21:12 ` [PATCH resend] " Jan H. Schönherr
2012-11-10 18:47 ` "Jan H. Schönherr"
2012-10-08 23:10 ` [PATCH] " Joe Perches
2012-09-28 2:28 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50732F8A.9090109@cs.tu-berlin.de \
--to=schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.