From: Olivier Bonvalet <btrfs.list@daevel.fr>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [solved] Re: Frozen transaction
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:49:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50742B4D.5060600@daevel.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009123249.GO4405@twin.jikos.cz>
On 09/10/2012 14:32, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 12:07:20PM +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
>> I didn't see any "stack" entry in /proc/$PID/ ; I will try to find which
>> kernel option export that.
>
> CONFIG_STACKTRACE
CONFIG_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API=y
CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is not set
CONFIG_USER_STACKTRACE_SUPPORT=y
# CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW is not set
I suppose it's CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE ?
>
>>> If the problem persists accross reboots, how long after mount does it
>>> take to get to this state? Cleaner usually kicks in after the 30 second
>>> transaction commit period, so this should be easy to verify if it's
>>> immediate or if it requires some load to get into the dead state.
>>
>> The cleaner process get it's state D between 30 and 60 seconds after the
>> reboot. But that cleaner process should not throw a lot of write access ?
>
> It needs to update the references so does both reads and writes.
>
>> This time I tried to remount with the space-cache enabled, there is a lot of
>> read access now. Does that space cache will help to find "free locations" ?
>
> Yes.
>
> As for the reads, the free space needs to fill the memory structures, if
> the disk is almost full there are also quite some data to read before
> it's complete. But reads are not the problem.
Well... I don't know if it is related to that space cache, but the
cleanup process is now working : it makes a lot of write requests, and I
have now 30Go of free space. So it will be solved soon.
Any chance that it can be related to that space cache feature ?
>> I suppose I can't resize the FS without solving that cleanup deadlock before
>> ?
>
> Probably no, although if you're fast enough and add another device before
> the cleaner starts, it could work :)
Ho it's possible, it's a virtualized system, so the device can easily grow.
> Other than that, these are the patches that should fix the deadlock:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1383951/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1383941/
>
> (it touches vfs and needs recompiling whole kernel, not just btrfs)
>
I was starting to patch my kernel before to see it's now solved.
Thanks for your answers !
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 7:37 Frozen transaction Olivier Bonvalet
2012-10-09 9:52 ` David Sterba
2012-10-09 10:07 ` Olivier Bonvalet
2012-10-09 12:32 ` David Sterba
2012-10-09 13:49 ` Olivier Bonvalet [this message]
2012-10-09 14:07 ` [solved] " David Sterba
2012-10-09 14:12 ` Olivier Bonvalet
2012-10-09 14:55 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50742B4D.5060600@daevel.fr \
--to=btrfs.list@daevel.fr \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.