From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLlab-0006HH-UP for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 04:00:02 +0200 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q9A1kos6001861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:46:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.162.159] (128.224.162.159) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.309.2; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:46:50 -0700 Message-ID: <5074D388.6060008@windriver.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:46:48 +0800 From: jhuang0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Burton, Ross" References: <2072868.bxk9nbbmYZ@helios> In-Reply-To: Cc: Paul Eggleton , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ruby: Add from OE-Classic and update to 1.9.3-p194 X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:00:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/9/2012 8:38 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 9 October 2012 11:38, Paul Eggleton wrote: >>> * I sent this months ago but was told that oe-core is not the right place, >>> however, we think it makes sense to add ruby to complete the scripting >>> language set of: python, perl, ruby, so I re-send it. >> >> I have to say, my opinion is the same now as it was then. Ruby support is >> certainly useful to have, and we have had requests for it; but unlike Perl and >> Python which are needed by many other things, nothing we have in OE-Core >> actually needs Ruby; thus it really belongs in another layer IMHO. > > Agreed. If we're completing the set of scripting languages there's > plenty left out. A standalone meta-ruby layer that contains the > runtime and pretty much every useful library sounds like a much better > idea as the runtime and the libraries will be in a single place and > incompatible changes can be done in a single move without having to > co-ordinate multiple layers. I see, thanks, so I think I should send it to meta-oe at this point. Thanks, Jackie > > Ross > -- Jackie Huang WIND RIVER | China Development Center MSN:jackielily@hotmail.com Tel: +86 8477 8594 Mobile: +86 138 1027 4745