From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.saout.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.saout.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ch5M1qtHAVh3 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:45:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5075E748.2020603@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:23:20 +0200 From: Milan Broz MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5075E6B1.6040203@seznam.cz> In-Reply-To: <5075E6B1.6040203@seznam.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] verity for GRUB? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Geoffrey Thomas Cc: "wad@chromium.org" , "dm-crypt@saout.de" , "msb@chromium.org" , "ellyjones@chromium.org" , Mikulas Patocka , "agk@redhat.com" Sigh. Obviously I wanted to send this from RH email, sorry :) On 10/10/2012 11:20 PM, Milan Broz wrote: > On 10/10/2012 10:51 PM, Geoffrey Thomas wrote: >> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Mikulas Patocka wrote: >> >>>> If not, are you willing to relicense dm-verity.c and/or libverity as >>>> GPLv2+ instead of just GPLv2, so that I can just use that code with GRUB >>>> (GPLv3+) instead of reimplementing it? >>> >>> Ask Red Hat and Google if they want to relicense it. > > Is there anything from libcryptsetup you want to use or it is just about > kernel code? > > If you want to use code from cryptsetup (cryptsetup/lib/verity/*), what exactly > you need and which licence is ok for you (GPL2+ or LGPL?) > (GPL3 will be incompatible with other cryptsetup code.) > > Milan >