From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Sourav <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/24] OMAP serial driver flow control fixes, and preparation
 for DMA engine conversion
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:13:43 +0530
Message-ID: <507694CF.3020204@ti.com>
References: <20121006123803.GD15246@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <507427DA.6020409@ti.com> <87mwzuxjtc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <87mwzuxjtc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Sender: linux-serial-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org


Hi Kevin,
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 11:59 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hi Sourav,
>
> Sourav <sourav.poddar@ti.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> Boot Tested this patch series against v3.6 tag(applied cleanly) on
>> panda board and
>> PM tested(hitting off in Idle and suspend) on omap3630 based beagle board.
>>
>> Note, I also tested the patches against the current master but only
>> after rebasing, since the current master includes serial patches from
>> Felipe Balbi[1].
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/24/139
>>
>> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
> Did you test flow control after off-mode transitons?
>
> Russell indicated that the context save/restore is not saving important
> bits related to HW flow control, so I suspect some more testing,
> specifically of flow control after off-mode is needed.
>
> Kevin
The testing done was without any flow control enabled.
I will try to figure out how to do a hardware flow control testing
and see the status after the off mode.

~Sourav


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sourav.poddar@ti.com (Sourav)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:13:43 +0530
Subject: [RFC 00/24] OMAP serial driver flow control fixes, and preparation
 for DMA engine conversion
In-Reply-To: <87mwzuxjtc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
References: <20121006123803.GD15246@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <507427DA.6020409@ti.com> <87mwzuxjtc.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Message-ID: <507694CF.3020204@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org


Hi Kevin,
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 11:59 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hi Sourav,
>
> Sourav <sourav.poddar@ti.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> Boot Tested this patch series against v3.6 tag(applied cleanly) on
>> panda board and
>> PM tested(hitting off in Idle and suspend) on omap3630 based beagle board.
>>
>> Note, I also tested the patches against the current master but only
>> after rebasing, since the current master includes serial patches from
>> Felipe Balbi[1].
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/24/139
>>
>> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@ti.com>
> Did you test flow control after off-mode transitons?
>
> Russell indicated that the context save/restore is not saving important
> bits related to HW flow control, so I suspect some more testing,
> specifically of flow control after off-mode is needed.
>
> Kevin
The testing done was without any flow control enabled.
I will try to figure out how to do a hardware flow control testing
and see the status after the off mode.

~Sourav