From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.profihost.ag ([85.158.179.208]:53749 "EHLO mail.profihost.ag" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751934Ab2JKTyx (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:54:53 -0400 Message-ID: <50772408.9040303@profihost.ag> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:54:48 +0200 From: Stefan Priebe MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , Josef Bacik , miaox@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: problems with btrfs send / restore References: <50771F22.3070501@profihost.ag> <20121011194335.GE4405@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20121011194335.GE4405@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 11.10.2012 21:43, schrieb David Sterba: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:33:54PM +0200, Stefan Priebe wrote: >> [server: /btrfs/target]# btrfs send -i /btrfs/src/\@snapshot/1 >> /btrfs/src/\@snapshot/2 | btrfs receive /btrfs/target/\@snapshot/ >> At subvol /btrfs/src/@snapshot/2 >> At subvol 2 >> ERROR: failed to open /btrfs/target/@snapshot/@snapshot/1/test.tar. No such file or directory > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > I wonder if this is the ghost snapshot dir entry that Miao fixed. Did > somehow get into the 'send' stream and confused the receive side. > > david i missed two facts: 1.) vanilla kernel 3.6.1 2.) latest btrfs tools git (cloned at 10/10/2012) Stefan