From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:04:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] pinctrl/at91: fix compatible order In-Reply-To: <1350033790-31028-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> References: <1350033790-31028-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> Message-ID: <5078235C.1040204@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Le 10/12/2012 11:23 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD a ?crit : > the sam9x5 is new version of the rm9200 not the invert > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > Cc: Linus Walleij > --- > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c > index 9c0fe11..bdb152b 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c > @@ -1331,8 +1331,8 @@ static void __devinit at91_gpio_probe_fixup(void) > } > > static struct of_device_id at91_gpio_of_match[] __devinitdata = { > - { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio", .data = &at91rm9200_ops }, > { .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9x5-gpio", .data = &at91sam9x5_ops, }, > + { .compatible = "atmel,at91rm9200-gpio", .data = &at91rm9200_ops }, > { /* sentinel */ } > }; > > Do it also for at91_pinctrl_of_match[], there is the same issue. Regards Ludovic