From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl ([178.33.81.99]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TNjE0-0007Ao-Is for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:52:48 +0200 Received: by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3D2BFD22BC; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:39:40 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from [192.168.1.112] (87-206-60-225.dynamic.chello.pl [87.206.60.225]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl) by tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FF52D22B7 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:39:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <507BF5D6.5070604@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:39:02 +0200 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz Organization: Linaro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20121003 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <3713695.RcKMCbUqi3@helios> <507BEAD5.8020302@linaro.org> <1973903.D9SRCPrtLZ@helios> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [meta-webserver][PATCH 0/2] modphp fixes X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:52:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit W dniu 15.10.2012 13:24, Koen Kooi pisze: >>> Your do_configure did that. config.{sub,guess} were too old for >>> AArch64. > >> If you can make the build succeed without overriding do_configure, then >> please send patches. I didn't have any success with that the last time I >> tried it. > > adding a gnu-confiigize --force should be same enough, right? Yes, it did the trick. Thanks.