From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stuart Statman Subject: Re: "Blessed" Version Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:12:24 -0700 Message-ID: <507C5208.7050100@sunverge.com> References: <5074B274.7070703@sunverge.com> <507554BB.4000809@grandegger.com> <5077196C.60405@sunverge.com> <50793FAD.6030704@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:39643 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751869Ab2JOSMP (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:12:15 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id hz1so5099599pad.19 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:12:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <50793FAD.6030704@hartkopp.net> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Oliver Hartkopp Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger , linux-can@vger.kernel.org On 10/13/12 3:17 AM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >> 2. Is there a can_if style script that already handles slcan? > We have extended the can_if script for slcan at Volkswagen and also extended > the slcand to do some of the setup from slcan_attach (e.g. for the CAN > bitrate). I don't know the exact state of these extensions and if it works > stable in all environments (udev, ...). But if you like, i can sent it to you > and you may check if it fit's your needs and if it's worth to merge it with > the can-utils. I would love to see this! Thanks! -- Stu Statman VP of Engineering Sunverge, Inc http://www.sunverge.com