From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Ladisch Subject: Re: Non-Interleaved access method? Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:34:06 +0200 Message-ID: <5080135E.4020600@ladisch.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6052652E5 for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:35:23 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Prasant J Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Prasant J wrote: > When the application set the access method to non-interleaved, that > means that the ALSA application will deliver the non-interleaved > buffers to alsa subsystem & the alsa subsystem will interleave the > data before sending out the data to the hardware. Yes. > Or non-interleaved means that the data will be sent out in > non-interleaved manner itself? Only if the hardware supports it. (Very few chips do.) Regards, Clemens