From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: cpebenito@tresys.com (Christopher J. PeBenito)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 08:08:45 -0400
Subject: [refpolicy] [PATCH v1] Changes to the miscfiles policy module
In-Reply-To: <1349794664.30521.31.camel@d30.localdomain>
References: <1349441808-23943-1-git-send-email-dominick.grift@gmail.com>
	<5074312A.70907@tresys.com>
	<1349794664.30521.31.camel@d30.localdomain>
Message-ID: <508142CD.5040706@tresys.com>
To: refpolicy@oss.tresys.com
List-Id: refpolicy.oss.tresys.com

On 10/09/12 10:57, Dominick Grift wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:14 -0400, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> On 10/05/12 08:56, Dominick Grift wrote:
>>> The file context for /var/cache/man will be handled by mandb
>>>
>>> Change various miscfiles man interfaces to include relevant mandb
>>> interface calls
>>
>> I'm not sure that this is the right way to do.  If you have miscfiles and not mandb, then you have a mislabeled /var/cache/man.  I looked at your mandb.fc, and the entrypoint looks like a script; what is actually running?  makewhatis?
> 
> Ok how about we require mandb module by the miscfiles module instead?
> 
> I can remove the optional(`')
> 
> That way one cannot have the misfiles module without the mandb module
 
No, modules can't unconditionally depend on modules at higher layers.

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
www.tresys.com | oss.tresys.com