From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Bader Subject: Re: Xen PVM: Strange lockups when running PostgreSQL load Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:57:50 +0200 Message-ID: <50816A6E.5010602@canonical.com> References: <1350479456-4007-1-git-send-email-stefan.bader@canonical.com> <507EB27D.8050308@citrix.com> <1350482118.2460.74.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <507ECD06.2050407@canonical.com> <507ED038.8000806@citrix.com> <507FC51102000078000A235E@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <507FC71502000078000A236C@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <507FB1E1.8080700@canonical.com> <1350546483.28188.25.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <507FD7DE.2010209@canonical.com> <507FFA5102000078000A250D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <507FF964.9090009@canonical.com> <50806C0B.1060504@canonical.com> <5081264002000078000A2841@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <50811047.4080200@canonical.com> <5081387B02000078000A288D@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <50815DA1.10303@canonical.com> <5081847E02000078000A2A09@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4635424189953540683==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5081847E02000078000A2A09@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===============4635424189953540683== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9142175BC7ABA196A9E7D577" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9142175BC7ABA196A9E7D577 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19.10.2012 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote: >> No, I assumed that you saying native kernel did prior to ticket lock=20 >> conversion, >=20 > I indeed did say that. Just go look back at the old code. No, sorry, but no. Just that old code did it does not help me here. I di = believe you there. Still it seems there is something wrong doing it there in a pv= guest. Though I cannot give a satisfying explanation, yet. --------------enig9142175BC7ABA196A9E7D577 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQgWpuAAoJEOhnXe7L7s6jS1kQAOTc3dspTUgYTybVm23Oec2g ERzN4iAIbdNlSn5Ewzy6hXR/zsJ0fxYDJnZFVkKQz5LMU7wHnn534qNuq5Gnjh2b G4YmxIz66AmLL4s3vNPDzCDejiA2I9PtSMFWtAIBLLpAsqoC06bs5U/Lh7D25jSJ MWnwEBYThHiv9mQdNXdGMfJ4TLblffk73Y99MMVGcJi/ZC+6/BO6cosIJaViVK4B +jxOs2Wh30n7ZZ11fC8jlFNFFgDZTUQp77jFv7U4suI6eU5x/KUOI4t0ofFIZnqV nJAY8pnnz+Ky+XAVpEWaUQVV1iffbSAaVxX292/WRxdIgsWxnyQ89R/Obzt9QUic 2BuN8sIOoLq9a1t4psip580vE5SwlTTGbOrGkLEfwESlBUQLp4/LUrvJVR2zlkFe D3Dgn9CsffrTkccR7lP7GT+zr5Qn+TZFXiePBMSTS8Bj5yM/sr18Oa6DfQj11dKx Uat7aEE1p8pE3ZWZbIveLCeX0LieDZxpQR2FtDpskkRkYkG+Mj5yEfM7BIHm78xK D+jakJF0wIjsXEL1OUYfLOiN+/U+bt9fQqqpQV+vyubHn4Cx6VeiGr3SOwnPXAZf OaWl8ngHSqKR4ixmBhZ63YlAUWqhiqPfeeU5NzUCdLwwmXnYLFvB+hzw5GGwfepp uGhDC9vd0JQallSH2iDf =R/iq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9142175BC7ABA196A9E7D577-- --===============4635424189953540683== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============4635424189953540683==--