From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
To: Tomas Frydrych <tf@r-finger.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out?
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:01:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50819565.5090604@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508164D0.1020408@r-finger.com>
On 10/19/2012 07:33 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>
> Looking over meta-dlna in Yocto git I see it's little more than a fork
> of meta-guacamayo from guacamayo-project.org -- could someone please
> explain to me why the git history was stripped out from this 'combo' layer?
>
My apologies, I updated the MAINTAINER and README files.
> (I am delighted Intel is finding Guacamayo useful, but the obliteration
> of the history makes it look as if the credit for this official Yocto
> layer goes to Intel; I am sure that was not intentional.)
>
No this was not intentional, the combo-layer tool seems to do that. I
used combo layer because we wanted to pull in the kvm changes so that
this could be shown as a VM.
> I am also interested in knowing why the fork was deemed necessary in the
> first place, just in case it was for technical reasons that could be
> addressed at source.
>
In the first pass, there were mostly minor changes to cut this down to
what was needed for the headless media server. As I moved to 1.3 there
were more changes that I have made, you can see what's going on in the
1.3wip branch of meta-dlna. If you want some of those changes in
meta-guacamayo please take them.
My goal is to make the meta-dlna be more cut down and not require the
as much. If we can accomplish that directly with meta-guacamayo that
would be awesome.
Right now I am fighting a dbus/rygel segfault.
Sau!
> Tomas
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-19 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-19 14:33 why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out? Tomas Frydrych
2012-10-19 18:01 ` Saul Wold [this message]
2012-10-20 12:16 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-10-20 13:13 ` Ross Burton
2012-10-22 8:06 ` Tomas Frydrych
2012-10-22 8:43 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-10-22 7:53 ` Tomas Frydrych
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-19 14:34 Tomas Frydrych
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50819565.5090604@linux.intel.com \
--to=sgw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tf@r-finger.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.