From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Witold Szczeponik Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] PNP: Allow PNP resources to be disabled (interface) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:02:20 +0200 Message-ID: <5081A3BC.9050201@gmx.net> References: <50158321.4030007@gmx.net> <201208022340.16948.rjw@sisk.pl> <5055DFB6.6070809@gmx.net> <201209182342.30244.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201209182342.30244.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Borislav Petkov , bhelgaas@google.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 18/09/12 23:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote: >> Hi Rafael, >> >> what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI? >> The first patch simplifies the code, while the third patch fixes a problem in >> the PNP resource allocation. Any chances to have them included in 3.7? > > They would be fine as far as I'm concerned, but I'm not maintaining that part > of the kernel (at least at the moment). > > I'm not sure who's the maintainer of it, to be honest. Well, according to https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/19/375, that would be you (together with Bjorn and Len). :-) Hence I am resending the request for inclusion to you as well. PNP code went, if I am not mistaken, traditionally through Len's tree. --- Witold > > Thanks, > Rafael >