From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <50829EC8.1030809@xenomai.org> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:53:28 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50798BD3.6010308@xenomai.org> <50798F8A.8060508@xenomai.org> <508171AB.8010707@xenomai.org> <50818781.7050204@xenomai.org> <50827B74.2030408@xenomai.org> <50829C67.9040909@xenomai.org> <50829D93.7000407@xenomai.org> <50829E28.2020801@xenomai.org> In-Reply-To: <50829E28.2020801@xenomai.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Which kernel versions? List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Philippe Gerum Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On 10/20/2012 02:50 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 10/20/2012 02:48 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> On 10/20/2012 02:43 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>> On 10/20/2012 12:22 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >>> >>>> Note that the list is not exhaustive, because it does not includes >>>> patches that were published before the i386/x86_64 merge, if you take >>>> that into account, you can even run Xenomai 2.6.1 with 2.4 kernels. >>>> >>> >>> 2.4.25/ppc only though. We stopped maintaining 2.4/x86 setups many moons >>> ago, so I doubt this would even build. >> >> >> It is build-tested with every release. >> > > Build AND tested, or tested for build? I did not test such configuration > for ages, do you actually test this? > tested for build only. -- Gilles.