From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932816Ab2JVCOh (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:14:37 -0400 Received: from mailout2.samsung.com ([203.254.224.25]:11713 "EHLO mailout2.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932777Ab2JVCOg (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:14:36 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee61a-b7fa66d0000004cf-f9-5084ac0a43be Message-id: <5084AC0A.8040608@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:14:34 +0900 From: Chanwoo Choi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Jenny TC Cc: MyungJoo Ham , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] extcon : register for cable interest by cable name References: <1350475725-8457-1-git-send-email-jenny.tc@intel.com> In-reply-to: <1350475725-8457-1-git-send-email-jenny.tc@intel.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jQV2uNS0BBrPumlpc3jWHzYHR4/Mm uQDGKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6Mjwc/sxfM4Ky4equHsYHxEHsXIyeHhICJxPvu88wQtpjEhXvr 2boYuTiEBKYzSqw8O50JwulikmhffYARpIpXQEvie+c0sG4WAVWJdZ2tYN1sQPH9L24AdXNw iApESPzq54AoF5T4MfkeC4gtIqAo8en0fSYQm1nAU6JvRjsbiC0s4CWx8fpWsDFCAo4SN2as ABvPKeAk0b1gIjNEvY7E/tZpbBC2vMTmNW+ZJzAKzEKyYhaSsllIyhYwMq9iFE0tSC4oTkrP NdQrTswtLs1L10vOz93ECA7AZ1I7GFc2WBxiFOBgVOLhnbGwJUCINbGsuDL3EKMEB7OSCO+p eKAQb0piZVVqUX58UWlOavEhRmkOFiVx3maPlAAhgfTEktTs1NSC1CKYLBMHp1QDo3XMgZj5 z0SLEzwqaiVfLJVf9oA7dsECu6QFVmnRt//vP620ay0ng+YrJtVX1Tdq3s+bfObdEcugp+ZF 19KPXknkXDs5V0654Y7n/CChMrNU/Xv/xHcVCEsKRk3ZnftwqvgPjQSJbyFH3aWDHzxZ+4w1 0WHFvsWmm/ds8C49k2b60+SzUvbjBUosxRmJhlrMRcWJACxzWzs8AgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/2012 09:08 PM, Jenny TC wrote: > There are some scnearios where a driver/framework needs to register > interest for a particular cable without specifying the extcon device > name. One such scenario is charger notifications. The platform will > have charger cabel which will be bound to any extcon device. It's > not mandatory for the charger driver to know which extcon device > it should use. This patch enables the support for registering > interest for a cable just by cable name wihtout specifying the > extcon device name > > Signed-off-by: Jenny TC > --- > v1: > Initial submit > V2: > Removed the new API and modified the extcon_register_interest > API to accomodate the new requirement > > drivers/extcon/extcon-class.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi Applied it and This patch is tested by me on charger-manager. You can check it after some hours at extcon tree: - http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/extcon-for-next Thanks, Chanwoo Choi