From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from r-finger.com (r-finger.com [178.79.160.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA00E01248 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 01:06:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (host81-153-114-123.range81-153.btcentralplus.com [81.153.114.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by r-finger.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48EA299A4 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:06:42 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <5084FE91.5040206@r-finger.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 09:06:41 +0100 From: Tomas Frydrych User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.5) Gecko/20120624 Icedove/10.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <508164D0.1020408@r-finger.com> <50819565.5090604@linux.intel.com> <1377035.Z5LEapOdJV@helios> In-Reply-To: <1377035.Z5LEapOdJV@helios> Subject: Re: why was meta-dlna submodule history stripped out? X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:06:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 20/10/12 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote: > Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta- > guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers. Ah, so there is an official community and an unoffical one, this community stuff is becoming rather difficult. ;-) I don't have any objections in principle, in fact you will see that number of the recipes in meta-guacamayo consists of a generic recipe and a guacamayo-specific bbappend. The main reason for maintaining most of the recipes in meta-guacamayo is precisely so that they would be maintained and updated in timely fashion and work with the stable release of Yocto. Guacamayo aims to facilitate that. Tomas