All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Haley <brian.haley@hp.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:47:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5085BF0A.2030602@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350941831.8609.1355.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On 10/22/2012 05:37 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-22 at 17:20 -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
> 
>> It's not much different from what's there:
>>
>> 	setsockopt("foo");
>>
>> 	rename foo -> bar
>>
>> 	index = getsockopt();
>> 	if_indextoname(index) -> "bar"
>>
>> I more raised the issue since you pass a 'char *' to setsockopt() but an 'int *'
>> to getsockopt(), I don't think any other value is non-symmetrical like this.
>>
>> -Brian
> 
> I meant another cpu can be changing dev->name[] content while the
> strcpy() is done, and you get a mangled devname, like "for" or "bao"
> instead of "foo" or "bar"

Even when holding the rcu_read_lock()?  I'd have to hold the rtnl lock there?

-Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-22 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-19  9:55 [PATCH net-next] sockopt: Make SO_BINDTODEVICE readable Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-19 10:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22  0:43 ` David Miller
2012-10-22 10:20   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 18:04 ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:28   ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:23     ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 20:45   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:10     ` Pavel Emelyanov
2012-10-22 21:20     ` Brian Haley
2012-10-22 21:37       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:47         ` Brian Haley [this message]
2012-10-22 21:52           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-10-22 21:58             ` Ben Hutchings
2012-10-23 21:43             ` Brian Haley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5085BF0A.2030602@hp.com \
    --to=brian.haley@hp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.