From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devtools: add long lines to the list of
	options
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 19:38:36 +0100
Message-ID: <5086780.mtiN8QzXmL@xps13>
References: <1488390259-40462-1-git-send-email-allain.legacy@windriver.com>
 <20170301100851.60c3e46c@xeon-e3>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Allain Legacy <allain.legacy@windriver.com>, dev@dpdk.org
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FAE4CE4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Mar 2017 19:38:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u199so43640376wmd.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:38:37 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20170301100851.60c3e46c@xeon-e3>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2017-03-01 10:08, Stephen Hemminger:
> > --- a/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > +++ b/devtools/checkpatches.sh
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ options="$options --ignore=LINUX_VERSION_CODE,FILE_PATH_CHANGES,\
> >  VOLATILE,PREFER_PACKED,PREFER_ALIGNED,PREFER_PRINTF,\
> >  PREFER_KERNEL_TYPES,BIT_MACRO,CONST_STRUCT,\
> >  SPLIT_STRING,LINE_SPACING,PARENTHESIS_ALIGNMENT,NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE,\
> > -NEW_TYPEDEFS,COMPARISON_TO_NULL"
> > +NEW_TYPEDEFS,COMPARISON_TO_NULL,LONG_LINE_STRING"
> 
> Maybe it is time to have our own DPDK version of checkpatch which knows about
> DPDK API's like logging functions?

It is Perl code!
If we can have a reliable maintainer, why not.