From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [kvmarm] [PATCH] KVM: Take kvm instead of vcpu to mmu_notifier_retry Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:36:17 +0200 Message-ID: <50868131.2090208@redhat.com> References: <1350270618-9712-1-git-send-email-c.dall@virtualopensystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu To: Christoffer Dall Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17861 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752825Ab2JWLgf (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2012 07:36:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1350270618-9712-1-git-send-email-c.dall@virtualopensystems.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/15/2012 05:10 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > The mmu_notifier_retry is not specific to any vcpu (and never will be) > so only take struct kvm as a parameter. > > The motivation is the ARM mmu code that needs to call this from > somewhere where we long let go of the vcpu pointer. Applied, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function