From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3.7.0-rc2] dt: match id-table before creating platform device
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 08:15:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5086988F.6090107@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350988259-22767-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
Adding lkml. DT patches should go to both lists.
On 10/23/2012 05:30 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
>
> As part of of_platform_populate call, the existing code iterates each
> child node and then creates a platform device for each child, however
> there is bug in the code which does not check the match table before
> creating the platform device. This might result creating two platfrom
> devices and also invoking driver probe twice, which is incorrect.
>
> This patch moves a existing of_match_node check to start of the function
> to fix the bug, doing this way will return immediately without creating
> any datastructures if the child does not match the supplied match-table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@st.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/platform.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index b80891b..1aaa560 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -367,6 +367,9 @@ static int of_platform_bus_create(struct device_node *bus,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + if (!of_match_node(matches, bus))
> + return 0;
> +
This is not right. This function is recursive and this change would
break that. Perhaps we could only call of_platform_device_create_pdata
if !of_match_node instead, but I'm not completely sure that would be the
right thing to do. There's also some historical things we have to
support which is why we have of_platform_populate and of_platform_bus_probe.
Rob
> auxdata = of_dev_lookup(lookup, bus);
> if (auxdata) {
> bus_id = auxdata->name;
> @@ -379,7 +382,7 @@ static int of_platform_bus_create(struct device_node *bus,
> }
>
> dev = of_platform_device_create_pdata(bus, bus_id, platform_data, parent);
> - if (!dev || !of_match_node(matches, bus))
> + if (!dev)
> return 0;
>
> for_each_child_of_node(bus, child) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-23 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-23 10:30 [RFC PATCH 3.7.0-rc2] dt: match id-table before creating platform device Srinivas KANDAGATLA
2012-10-23 13:15 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-10-24 10:45 ` Srinivas KANDAGATLA
[not found] ` <5086988F.6090107-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-10-26 7:12 ` Srinivas KANDAGATLA
2012-10-26 7:12 ` Srinivas KANDAGATLA
2012-11-14 22:20 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5086988F.6090107@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.