All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>
To: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.7-rc1] nouveau cli->mutex possible recursive locking detected
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:26:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508905D2.9070907@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5087E2D8.9010703@broadcom.com>

On 10/24/2012 02:45 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 01:14 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>> On 10/16/2012 02:43 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
>>> I have this lockdep warning on wireless-testing tree based
>>> on 3.7-rc1 (no other patches except wireless bits).
>>>
>>> =============================================
>>> Restarting tasks ... done.
>>> [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
>>> 3.7.0-rc1-wl+ #2 Not tainted
>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>> Xorg/2269 is trying to acquire lock:
>>>   (&cli->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa012a27f>]
>>> nouveau_bo_move_m2mf+0x5f/0x170 [nouveau]
>>>
>>> but task is already holding lock:
>>>   (&cli->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa012f3c4>]
>>> nouveau_abi16_get+0x34/0x100 [nouveau]
>>>
>>
>> I have observed the same bug so I built and tested v3.7-rc2 tag with
>> lockdep enabled. It has the same problem and it results in a failure to
>> resume after suspend. See below.
>>
>> Gr. AvS
>
> digging into the trace:
>
>
> nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf() calls nouveau_abi16_get() which grabs the
> mutex. Assume this should protect the chan variable passed to
> nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(), which does a bit more that validate as
> it ends up in nouveau_bo_move_m2mf() which uses the drm->chan. However,
> it deadlocks before that.
>
> Gr. AvS

Maybe this helps. The two locations where the lock is grabbed are from 
the same commit (see below).

Gr. AvS

commit ebb945a94bba2ce8dff7b0942ff2b3f2a52a0a69
Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 20 08:17:34 2012 +1000

     drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine module format

     This is a HUGE commit, but it's not nearly as bad as it looks - any 
problems
     can be isolated to a particular chipset and engine combination.  It was
     simply too difficult to port each one at a time, the compat layers are
     *already* ridiculous.

     Most of the changes here are simply to the glue, the process for 
each of the
     engine modules was to start with a standard skeleton and copy+paste 
the old
     code into the appropriate places, fixing up variable names etc as 
needed.

     v2: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
     - fix find/replace bug in license header

     v3: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
     - bump indirect pushbuf size to 8KiB, 4KiB barely enough for 
userspace and
       left no space for kernel's requirements during GEM pushbuf 
submission.
     - fix duplicate assignments noticed by clang

     v4: Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com>
     - add sparse annotations to nv04_fifo_pause/nv04_fifo_start
     - use ioread32_native/iowrite32_native for fifo control registers

     v5: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
     - rebase on v3.6-rc4, modified to keep copy engine fix intact
     - nv10/fence: unmap fence bo before destroying
     - fixed fermi regression when using nvidia gr fuc
     - fixed typo in supported dma_mask checking

     Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-25  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-16 12:43 [BUG 3.7-rc1] nouveau cli->mutex possible recursive locking detected Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-10-24 11:14 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-10-24 12:45   ` Arend van Spriel
2012-10-25  9:26     ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2012-10-25 10:14     ` Arend van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508905D2.9070907@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.