From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:39593 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760289Ab2JYUvX (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:51:23 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b15so792737eek.19 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5089A670.8050204@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:52:00 +0200 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cwillu CC: Chris Murphy , linux-btrfs Subject: Re: [RFC] New attempt to a better "btrfs fi df" References: <50899151.1070503@inwind.it> <38F223BF-9890-4854-B622-62738235F022@colorremedies.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2012-10-25 22:49, cwillu wrote: > And the all-important "Could you please run btrfs fi df and pastebin > the output so we can tell what the hell is going on?" :) I fully agree ! -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5