From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] block: Make blk_cleanup_queue() wait until request_fn finished
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:04:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <508A7C4B.2060904@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508A7B63.60608@acm.org>
Some request_fn implementations, e.g. scsi_request_fn(), unlock
the queue lock. Make sure that blk_cleanup_queue() waits until all
active request_fn invocations have finished. A block driver may
start cleaning up resources needed by its request_fn as soon as
blk_cleanup_queue() finished, so blk_cleanup_queue() must wait
for all outstanding request_fn invocations to finish.
Reported-by: Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <JBottomley@Parallels.com>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
block/blk-core.c | 3 +++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 2f1be7a..7662d83 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -308,7 +308,9 @@ void inline __blk_run_queue_uncond(struct request_queue *q)
if (unlikely(blk_queue_dead(q)))
return;
+ q->request_fn_active++;
q->request_fn(q);
+ q->request_fn_active--;
}
/**
@@ -407,6 +409,7 @@ static void __blk_drain_queue(struct request_queue *q, bool drain_all)
__blk_run_queue(q);
drain |= q->nr_rqs_elvpriv;
+ drain |= q->request_fn_active;
/*
* Unfortunately, requests are queued at and tracked from
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 8bc46c2..c9d233e 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -378,6 +378,12 @@ struct request_queue {
unsigned int nr_sorted;
unsigned int in_flight[2];
+ /*
+ * Number of active block driver functions for which blk_drain_queue()
+ * must wait. Must be incremented around functions that unlock the
+ * queue_lock internally, e.g. scsi_request_fn().
+ */
+ unsigned int request_fn_active;
unsigned int rq_timeout;
struct timer_list timeout;
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-26 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-26 12:00 [PATCH 0/7 v5] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2012-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: Avoid that blk_drain_queue() finishes early Bart Van Assche
2012-10-29 1:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-29 1:52 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-29 14:35 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-10-26 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: Let blk_drain_queue() caller obtain the queue lock Bart Van Assche
2012-10-29 1:55 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: Rename queue dead flag Bart Van Assche
2012-10-26 12:03 ` [PATCH 4/7] block: Avoid that request_fn is invoked on a dead queue Bart Van Assche
2012-10-29 1:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 12:04 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2012-10-29 2:00 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: Make blk_cleanup_queue() wait until request_fn finished Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 12:05 ` [PATCH 6/7] Fix race between starved list processing and device removal Bart Van Assche
2012-10-28 18:01 ` Zhuang, Jin Can
2012-10-29 14:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-10-30 5:40 ` Zhuang, Jin Can
2012-11-02 10:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-11-21 11:06 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <026701cdb8c3$d2e3cb50$78ab61f0$@min@lge.com>
2012-11-21 12:10 ` Bart Van Assche
2012-10-29 2:07 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-26 12:05 ` [PATCH 7/7] Remove get_device() / put_device() pair from scsi_request_fn() Bart Van Assche
2012-10-29 2:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-11-23 10:37 ` [PATCH 0/7 v5] More device removal fixes Bart Van Assche
2012-11-26 17:19 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=508A7C4B.2060904@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.