From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: Using asphyxiate with Doxygen and Java? Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:52:44 -0700 Message-ID: <508B3E6C.90308@inktank.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:57168 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758292Ab2J0Bwu (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:52:50 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n41so1550772dak.19 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:52:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Noah Watkins Cc: ceph-devel , Tommi Virtanen On 10/26/2012 06:26 PM, Noah Watkins wrote: > I stumbled upon Breathe, and then asphyxiate. The doxygenfile > directive in the later doesn't seem to like what Doxygen produces from > parsing JavaDoc markup, although I've read that the Doxygen produced > should be compliant. Here is the error: > > AssertionError: cannot handle compounddef kind=class Asphyxiate was written quickly to handle most of the markup used in the librados C API documentation. Of course, this didn't include any classes. It shouldn't be too difficult to add support for them, or other markup, to asphyxiate. I can help with this if you like. > Before going any further and I wanted to ping the list to see if > anyone thinks it would be a good/bad idea to look into this. It'd be > nice to have the Java documentation in Sphinx seamlessly. Any change > Breathe has gotten faster over time? It doesn't look like there's been much activity there in the last year. > THanks, > Noah