From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39781)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1TS4U0-0007h5-G4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:23:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1TS4Tz-0007ly-FS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:23:16 -0400
Received: from isrv.corpit.ru ([86.62.121.231]:59458)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mjt@tls.msk.ru>) id 1TS4Tz-0007lu-8n
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 07:23:15 -0400
Message-ID: <508BC420.8000202@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 15:23:12 +0400
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1348584532-21914-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<876271ol4w.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5062AA0C.60303@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<CAFEAcA8F2otWMrJC99xRv3mHtovO9gBxjk-ysqjVASe6QShtxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5062BA23.705@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<CAFEAcA9sjxHc9JddAFW99=0MA0H8_eWXRr8=ttdUVp3SfTPGsw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ehloj3rr.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50631789.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
In-Reply-To: <50631789.8040209@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] stop using stdio for monitor/serial/etc
 with -daemonize
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>

On 26.09.2012 18:56, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 17:46, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> []
>> This is a good example of where we need improved documentation but I
>> agree 100% with Peter.
> 
> So what do we do?
> 
> We've a clear bug, I can only fix it in the patch to the Debian
> package, since I've been asked about this bug multiple times,
> and I care about our users. It is at least consistent with the
> expectations.  Maybe at the same time, it's a good idea to print
> a warning about -nographic being deprecated, but this part should
> definitely be done upstream first.

Ping?

I still don't see why

 -nographic -daemonize

makes no sence while

 -curses -daemonize

does?  (Patch for the latter has been accepted right before my patch,
and even sent to -stable, but my patch is rejected without any conclusion).

Let's be at least consistent and either apply both or reject both, okay?

Thanks,

/mjt