From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Kampe Subject: Re: Using asphyxiate with Doxygen and Java? Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 08:57:24 -0700 Message-ID: <508C0464.7060307@inktank.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-da0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:62753 "EHLO mail-da0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759134Ab2J0P5c (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:57:32 -0400 Received: by mail-da0-f46.google.com with SMTP id n41so1752363dak.19 for ; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 08:57:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Noah Watkins Cc: ceph-devel TV is of the opinion that Asphyxiate was the right direction to move in, and that the sloth problems are solvable, but would require work. On 10/26/2012 6:26 PM, Noah Watkins wrote: > I stumbled upon Breathe, and then asphyxiate. The doxygenfile > directive in the later doesn't seem to like what Doxygen produces from > parsing JavaDoc markup, although I've read that the Doxygen produced > should be compliant. Here is the error: > > AssertionError: cannot handle compounddef kind=class > > Before going any further and I wanted to ping the list to see if > anyone thinks it would be a good/bad idea to look into this. It'd be > nice to have the Java documentation in Sphinx seamlessly. Any change > Breathe has gotten faster over time?